033212
Type
Movie
Year
1998
MPAA Rating
R
Runtime
93
Director(s)
Sam Miller

Among Giants' Sexy Actresses

Actresses appearing nude or sexy in this ...

actress
Griffiths, Rachel 13 Reviews

Among Giants' Sexy Actors

Actors appearing nude or sexy in this ...

actor
Thornton, James 1 Review
Postlethwaite, Pete 4 Reviews

nudity reviews for Among Giants member submitted

Rachel Griffiths
Chicago was written on June 8, 2001

2 scenes

The other reviewers do a good job of description and sandmanoftheneedles shows the start times. The first scene is at :40.5 and lasts 10 sec--ass and breasts (briefly) seen from medium distance. The second is at :54.25-:56--breasts, ass, and bushy bush.

sandmanoftheendless was written on January 18, 2001

2 scenes

40 mins into movie she gets out of bed and puts on a flannel shirt. You get the first brief glimpse of her wondeful body and boobs. It is brief. 54 mins into the movie is the rain scene. She is full frontal nude for the entire scene and she does have a wonderful body. Her breasts are full and natural.

movienudity was written on March 26, 2001

bedroom/rain-waterfall

she does two nude scenes in the movie and she looks great! the first, she gets out of bed and we see her breasts for a moment as well as her round ass as she dresses. the real treat comes later as she runs around with her man in what appears to be a open building of some kind...the scene lasts a very long time and includes male frontal nudity as well. rachel is totally nude as she turns the corner and she walks toward the camera showing us all. she has large, drooping breasts with large aerolas and nipples, and a very hairy and furry patch of pubic hair. as one of the other reviewers stated, she is a throw-back to the fleshy, curvy natural actresses of the 70's. i like the way she plays this scene. it is obvious that she is proud of her curvy body and she does her best to show it all off. at one point, she raises her arms abover her head which really makes her breasts look great! at the end of the scene she embraces the man under a torrential rain waterfall. one of the best nude scenes ever captured on film.

BiBoySTL was written on November 3, 1999

YUCK!

She is fully naked, frontal for about five minutes, but all I can say is yuck. I mean I love her, she was great in Muriels Wedding, but seeing Rachel naked was not a treat. Her boobs sag lower than her knees!

dav345 was written on January 15, 2004

full frontal and rear of Brenda from Six Feet Under

If you ever wanted to see Nate's girlfriend Brenda (Six Feet Under) naked, here is your chance. At the 51 minute mark, she gets out of bed and you get a good (if fast) look at her ass and really brief glances at her dark, full bush and huge breasts. This is just a preview of things to come. Late in the movie, she runs around a nuclear power plant, fully nude, and you get to see more of her than her gynecologist. You see her huge love pillows flopping around, her enormous dark bush, and her ass. This full frontal scene lasts a good 5 minutes. I've had a hard-on for her since Six Feet Under started, so this was a real treat.

snowdog was written on August 12, 1999

Fully nude extrazaganza

Wow. the academy award nominee shows all she has to offer towards the end of this film. The scene involves her running around under gushing water and is quite long. You get to see every angle of her fully naked body. The only drawback of the scene is that you also have to see Pete Postlethwaite with his ding-dong exposed for quite a long time.

BrianSLA was written on April 18, 2001

Full Frontal w/ Natural large breasts

I was really shocked to see how really big busted Rachel is. I loved her since Muriel's Wedding and she really doesn't look big but she is totally nude and for a long walk under falling water. Great scene.

RichT was written on November 25, 2001

Why didn't Pete Postletwait f*ck-off ?

Rachel is a rather attractive lady, with quite a nice body (especially her incredibly furry bush) Sadly her nude scene in this film, is somewhat spoilt by having to view a naked Pete Postletwat (please excuse my DELIBERATE typo !!!)

BushLeague was written on August 31, 2002

Two nude scenes--brief and long

She kind of reminds me of Mary Kay from Saturday Night Live. Although she is 30 in this movie, her face looks twenty four, but her body looks about 38 -- in movie star years. The first scene she hops out of bed and puts on a shirt. Full length, brightly lit rear view of her wide hips, smooth, but slightly saggy, jiggly, behind, and long legs add nice muscular back. Very brief alternating views of the sides of her left and right breasts as she turns back and forth to put on shirt (no nipples). Second scene is a very long walk through the bottom of a nuclear reactor cooling tower (!)(?), while she is showered with water. Can see slightly saggy, but still smooth breasts and thicket of black snatch and those long legs again. Occasional shots of the butt. Sometimes her boy friend obscures her nudity Lighting varies from almost dark to very bright as she moves in and out of shadows.

derek22 was written on May 25, 2002

4-star nude romp in zero-star movie

Pete and Rachel look terrific as they frolic frontally nude in a delightful "intermission" scene. Unfortunately, the rest of the flick is a complete waste of time. The producers probably decided to throw the scene in just to wake the audience up after the dull plot about tower painters puts them to sleep.

My suggestion: Fast forward to where the nude romp starts. Enjoy the interlude, and when it ends, rewind.

sowellhung was written on February 20, 2000

Outdoor Wet a la Natural

Fantastic Full-Frontal from this Talented actress.A real treat for lovers of Natural women. Rachel is a great reminder of the cassic 60s/70s actreeses who portrayed the womanhood in all its natural glory ie; heaving natural breasts and Full lush pubic hair growth.WOW!!

alekhidell was written on June 17, 2000

rain scene

Her and her male friend go runing off for this wooden structure? and shed their clothes on the way. It starts raining and her and her friend run around fully naked. No inhibitions at all. Her breasts are not sagging like the above review might suggest, its just that they are so big.

sirspread was written on February 1, 2003

nude

well described by previous viewer not much to add except that her boobs are to big for my liking but she has an incedibly hairy bush mmmmmm

James Thornton
5th_element was written on September 24, 2002

Out of bed

He is one handsome actor who has a slim body. Towards the end of the film, he is forced to have sex with the girl. After the sex, he gets out of the bed with guilt and walks towards the kitchen. We see his tall and lean back and his upper butt. Wish they showed more.

Pete Postlethwaite
Reno was written on February 9, 2002

Frontal

This gifted actor may not have a classic, big-screen look, but he is very appealing nonetheless, and in a scene calling for him to cavort with a young woman underneath some towers dripping water, he literally shows off his balls, also a nice uncut tool, and an overall attractive lean body, with hardly an ounce of fat anywhere. Pretty clear views of the goods, too. Did I mention I am a fan?

skinspotter was written on August 21, 2007

Full frontal

Pete shows us all here as he joyfully prances around completely naked with his female co-star. He's in good shape for his age and has no shame in exposing himself. His bum is lean and a nice shape and his penis and balls are well proportioned. As he moves around his penis bounces and jumps about which is very sexy so i give it the full 4 sstars.

BiBoySTL was written on November 3, 1999

Full frontal *shudder*

There should be an age limit on who can and cannot do full frontal nude scenes.. and Pete, you got the boot. Do not do another nude scene again! Now, if the scene had featured someone like Angelina Jolie and, um, Scott Caan as the lovers, then maybe....

derek22 was written on May 25, 2002

4-star nude romp in zero-star movie

Pete and Rachel look terrific as they frolic frontally nude in a delightful "intermission" scene. Unfortunately, the rest of the flick is a complete waste of time. The producers probably decided to throw the scene in just to wake the audience up after the dull plot about tower painters puts them to sleep.

My suggestion: Fast forward to where the nude romp starts. Enjoy the interlude, and when it ends, rewind.

Member Login

MrSkin Featured

Stay Connected

32x32-facebook 32x32-twitter 32x32-stumbleupon

© 2006-2017 Celebrity Nudity Database. All Rights Reserved.