Celebrity-nudity

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]

 * Register * FAQ    * Login 



Post new topic This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 713 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 ... 48  Next
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Dec 29, 2004 2:50 am 
Offline
novice member

Joined: Wed Dec 08, 2004 11:19 am
Posts: 89
Has thanked: 0 time
Have thanks: 0 time
Speaking of Torrie Wilson allegedly not doing full nudity anymore, if it's true it's just a part of the trend. If you check this month's Jenny McCarthy pictorial and May 2004 Pam Anderson pictorials you can see that even those two are getting more and more modest in their pictorials.
I have no idea who the hell is Molly Holly (only wrestling women I know are those who already posed for Playboy) but she wouldn't be the first to claim she would never pose and then do it after all.

And please people, note the f*cking word rumours in topic title and don't take everything as absolute truth. No matter how good sources do you have, things can change few days before issue hits the stands, and this issue is timed for SUMMER, months away.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Reason why the WWE would have all the women pose.
PostPosted: Wed Dec 29, 2004 4:55 am 
Their ratings are in the crapper and everything they have done lately has failed to raise them. They have lost Stone Cold, Rock and Mick Foley who were the big names during the late nineties boom times. They have not put any attempt into making new stars (mostly thanks the Triple H) and they have greatly "toned down" their product becuase of troubles with the Parental Television Council. They have also had to "ground" many of their wrestlers in the ring becuase of the many injuries wrestlers were getting due to doing the high flying moves. In other words, the product that the WWE is offering right now is stale so, why not try to get the viewers back by showing the girls they have to offer? I also believe this is being done becuase WWE recently went on a hiring spree of women (Chirsty Hemee, Amy Weber and a couple of others) and Vince is just trying to get everythign he can out of them since there is very little hop of these girls wrestling or becoming mangers.

Anyways, thats my idea why WWE is doing it. As for Molly, maybe she changed her mind, people are allowed to do that you know.

I think the really surprising one is Daddy's little girl Stephanie. She has not even been on TV for a year or so and I think most people are glad for it.


Top
  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Dec 29, 2004 11:10 am 
For the person asking for proof, I will tell you what, Why dont you Post your employee number, Your age, Your job title, your work phone number etc.

First of all, I only posted this to help with the Playboy News and Rumors.
If you dont want to believe it fine....like I said its NEWS AND RUMORS

as far as Torrie. It is true. She no longer wants to do Full on nudity in Playboy. It took forever for playboy to coax her into doing it in the first place. she was in three issues. and now she is done.

as far as Molly or Nora is concerned. I am getting this information from friends second hand. the isssue hasnt started shooting yet, it isnt scheduled to shoot until march or april. When the actual pictures get snapped. then I will let you know who is actually in the issue itself.

the list i provided you with is whom the WWE and Playboy have talked about and which Women have agreed. It does not mean all of them will pose. maybe they have Nora confused with someone else. they are all
RUMORS


and Stephanie Mcmahon Was in negotiations when i posted that two weeks ago, she has agreed since. however like i said, she had provisions
and she will not go entirely nude. In fact she agreed to just Lingerie, which means it may be sexy, but there is a chance is will not go nude at all. same with molly, Your right maybe she doesnt like being nude. however if they are paying her to pose in lingerie, she might do it.


Top
  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Dec 29, 2004 11:45 am 
Alright You know what? I admit it, I lied to you guys, I made the whole thing up. to see if people
were really stupid enough to believe it.

and I was right. the Funniest thing is that Joey Styles fell For it. HAHAHAHA!


Top
  
 
 Post subject: To the person who just posted a fake post under my name.....
PostPosted: Wed Dec 29, 2004 12:09 pm 
Stop stalking me, stop asking for my employee number.

I am asking the board moderator to Ban this person.

I did not make up any rumors, I do not know who Joey Stiles is.

and I wish you would grow up


Top
  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Dec 29, 2004 12:11 pm 
Offline
newbie member

Joined: Wed Dec 29, 2004 12:08 pm
Posts: 15
Has thanked: 0 time
Have thanks: 0 time
I had to register so that the above mentioned who posted as me, who grow up

_________________
The Photographer


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Dec 29, 2004 12:37 pm 
Offline
newbie member

Joined: Wed Dec 29, 2004 12:08 pm
Posts: 15
Has thanked: 0 time
Have thanks: 0 time
oh one more thing, if you need to inquire about my employment

send your letters or faxes to

Dennis Publishing 1040 Avenue of the Americas
New York, NY 10018
Fax: 212-768-1319


ask for my boss Felix Dennis


ask him who his favorite Celebrity Photographer is, and how at first he didnt like my Shoot of Poppy.

_________________
The Photographer


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Dec 29, 2004 1:17 pm 
And one more thing, Linda McMahon is in talks to appear in the issue.


Top
  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Dec 29, 2004 2:02 pm 
Offline
novice member

Joined: Tue Dec 28, 2004 5:40 pm
Posts: 37
Has thanked: 0 time
Have thanks: 0 time
look man,i don't care about any of the oter women,but Molly is religious and said she would never pose,so i just need to know,can you tell me if Molly has actually agreed,or is it just a second hand rumor like was said before and someone else may have been mistaken for Molly?

and come on,Linda Mcmahon? who's posting that?
two guys calling themselfs photographer doesn't add any credibility to this thread,but hey,like both said,it's a rumor,i doubt it will happen.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Dec 29, 2004 4:11 pm 
2005 Photographer wrote:
I had to register so that the above mentioned who posted as me, who grow up


2005 I'm not stalking you, I just wanna see proof. I said BLUR your ID and name, just show something you work for Maxim. Damn, I'm not asking for personal information, just blur any shit that could identify you. I think you seem to be the real deal. You got an e-mail or anything? Personally I'm a wrestling fan like a lot of people who have tracked down this rumor - and I wanna see if it's real or not - and that is all.


Top
  
 
 Post subject: Well...
PostPosted: Wed Dec 29, 2004 4:25 pm 
Seems legit to me.


Top
  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Dec 29, 2004 7:05 pm 
2005 Photographer wrote:
oh one more thing, if you need to inquire about my employment

send your letters or faxes to

Dennis Publishing 1040 Avenue of the Americas
New York, NY 10018
Fax: 212-768-1319


ask for my boss Felix Dennis


ask him who his favorite Celebrity Photographer is, and how at first he didnt like my Shoot of Poppy.


Are you Antoine Verglas? I enjoy your work. Keep up the good work.


Top
  
 
 Post subject: Re: Lita
PostPosted: Wed Dec 29, 2004 7:33 pm 
That is totally false. Lita is a family friend and I spoke to her last night. I was directed here via wrestling websites. She doesn't know anything about a Playboy shoot, they asked her last year and said said no, and she never would pose in that Magazine due to her strong moral beliefs.


Top
  
 
 Post subject: Re: Lita
PostPosted: Wed Dec 29, 2004 7:38 pm 
Offline
novice member

Joined: Tue Dec 28, 2004 5:40 pm
Posts: 37
Has thanked: 0 time
Have thanks: 0 time
Bobbyr wrote:
That is totally false. Lita is a family friend and I spoke to her last night. I was directed here via wrestling websites. She doesn't know anything about a Playboy shoot, they asked her last year and said said no, and she never would pose in that Magazine due to her strong moral beliefs.


thank you,and Molly Holly as any wrestling fan knows is also a person with strong moral and religious beleafes,and will not pose either,finally,some sanity.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Lita
PostPosted: Wed Dec 29, 2004 8:52 pm 
Evil One wrote:
Bobbyr wrote:
That is totally false. Lita is a family friend and I spoke to her last night. I was directed here via wrestling websites. She doesn't know anything about a Playboy shoot, they asked her last year and said said no, and she never would pose in that Magazine due to her strong moral beliefs.


thank you,and Molly Holly as any wrestling fan knows is also a person with strong moral and religious beleafes,and will not pose either,finally,some sanity.


So you believe one unproven poster, and not another? OK ... your a fucking idiot.


Top
  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 713 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 ... 48  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Jump to: